![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.claimtheearth.com\/games\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/graph_dividing_by_0-1024x581.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nNow let\u2019s look at how the unit of \u201chistory number\u201d is established. Because this dimension \u201cy\u201d is merged from two opposite directions, the unit \u201c1h\u201d is split by the real value \u201c0\u201d in the middle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The establishment and evolution of the above unit \u201ch\u201d for \u201chistory number\u201d is the proof of Riemann hypothesis. Because the original Riemann hypothesis was observed between the 2 dimensions of “real number” and “complex numbers”. Now when we can witness the same relationship between the 2 dimensions of “real number” and “history number”, then the inter-dimensional relationship defined in the hypothesis is “confirmed”, a.k.a. “proven”. An additional reminder to support such claim is: among inter-dimensional observations, there is no difference in status among \u201creference frame-set\u201d or “dimensions”. All dimensions (real number vs. complex number; real number vs. history number) are interchangeable, no matter in the Cartesian xyz coordinate system or Einstein’s xyz-t coordinate system, in abstract algebra.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Like in the numbering system of \u201ccomplex number\u201d, there are \u201creal part\u201d and \u201cimaginary part\u201d, if we make \u201chistory number\u201d to equivalently possess \u201creal part\u201d and \u201cstory part\u201d, then Goldbach\u2019s Conjecture becomes to prove numbers in the groups of \u201chistory number\u201d, the following equation is true \u201c1+ah = 0.5+bh + 0.5+ch\u201d in \u201creal part\u201d. That is to prove \u201c1=0.5+0.5\u201d, need I say more? It is as proven as being \u201cself-evident\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Aha, don\u2019t forget about the \u201cinfinite twin prime conjecture\u201d here either. Since Euclid has already proven there are infinite amount of prime numbers thousands of years ago, and now we have observed in the multiple dimensional space-time, (for prime numbers >3) the minimum prime number gap is \u201c1h\u201d in history number, or a projection of \u201c2\u201d in real number. \u201c1h\u201d or \u201c2\u201d are the dimensions module that can be used to solve modulus to determine prime number among nature numbers. Therefore it is proven, there has to be infinite twin prime numbers among natural numbers, or otherwise we would have been 1) disputing with Euclid; 2) letting second part of natural number changing the dimensions of minimal gap module \u201c1h\u201d or \u201c2\u201d for the first part of the natural numbers. 1) and 2) would both be irrational.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Among researchers who study number theories, \u201cdividing by 0\u201d, “infinity” and \u201cinfinitesimal\u201d are the taboo topics, because historically, students of “number theories” had the natural tendency to refuse treating “number theory” as part of the “group theory”. Numbers in number…<\/span><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.claimtheearth.com\/games\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/history_unit-1024x651.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n